It was asserted by defendant in opposition to plaintiff's motion that plaintiff was retained to collect money due defendant, and that defendant's claim, with respect to which plaintiff's services were performed, was settled by an agreement to pay the amount due in installments. Defendant contended that the retainer agreement, under which plaintiff was entitled to receive 30% of all amounts recovered by defendant, was amended before the settlement so as to provide that plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
