This case is before us a second time. On the first appeal, we held that the board had erred in failing to find that claimant was totally disabled and remitted the matter for further consideration (281 App. Div. 722). Upon such remission, the board modified its prior decision to the extent of finding that claimant had been totally disabled since 1932. However, it did not alter its earlier finding that claimant was entitled to a maximum rate of $9.61, the board ruling that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
