Item 1(e) relates to the income derived by defendant from exhibition of the picture. The only reason advanced by plaintiff for retaining this item is that it will furnish further evidence of the extent of the exhibition of the motion picture in which her right of privacy was allegedly violated. The remaining items upon which defendant may be examined furnish ample scope for eliciting such evidence, and in a tort action for personal injuries such as this (Riddle v. McFadden...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
