HANOVER BANK v. DE KOENIGSBERG


207 Misc. 1088 (1954)

Hanover Bank, Landlord, Appellant, v. Nicholas De Koenigsberg, Tenant, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 30, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Manfred Nathan for appellant.

David Haimes and Lewis Perkiss for respondent.

HAMMER and HECHT, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; HOFSTADTER, J., dissents in memorandum.


Per Curiam.

By leave of the court below the landlord appeals from said order.

On the application for "extension" of the stay the tenant states that he did not receive notice of the decision from the court or the landlord's attorney; "that deponent was out of town, and when he returned on September 30, 1954 he found out that the decision had been rendered and the stay had expired"; and that on September 30th...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases