1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 273 P.2d
  5. 273 P.2d 1010 (1954)
 

VICK v. ZUMWALT

No. 17203.

273 P.2d 1010 (1954)

VICK v. ZUMWALT et al.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Rehearing Denied September 27, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chilson & McCreary, Loveland, for plaintiff in error.

Riffenburgh & Harden, Fort Collins, for defendants in error.

KNAUSS, Justice.

In the trial court plaintiff in error M. M. Vick and his son, David Vick, were defendants, and defendants in error were plaintiffs. The essential facts are that M. M. Vick of Loveland, Colorado on February 16, 1952 was the owner of a Mercury automobile; that on said date his son, David, then almost fifteen years of age, while his parents were away from their home and in Fort Collins, Colorado, took the Mercury automobile from his father's garage and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases