The assistant district attorney in summation departed from his usual practice of arguing on the facts and, undoubtedly without intending to arouse prejudice in the minds of the jury against the appellant, made statements which could hardly have failed to create such prejudice and lead the jury from an unbiased consideration of the main issue and of the testimony as to appellant's prior good...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
