BORGOS v. DUERSTEIN


307 N.Y. 932 (1954)

Edwin F. Borgos et al., Respondents, v. Edward G. Duerstein et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 3, 1954


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry G. Herman, County Attorney, for motion.

Julius Garrell and Harry Merwin opposed.


Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements, upon the ground that the movant is neither a "party aggrieved" (Civ. Prac. Act, § 557, subd. 1) nor a "person aggrieved who is not a party but is entitled to be substituted in place of a party" within the meaning of section 557 (subd. 2) of the Civil Practice Act. Motion for an order of substitution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases