MARTIN v. COLUMBIA PICTURES CORP.


307 N.Y. 922 (1954)

In the Matter of Lester Martin, Respondent, v. Columbia Pictures Corporation, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 3, 1954


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ferdinand Pecora and David H. Horowitz for appellant.

Meier Steinbrink, Harry Heller, William Gellin and Max M. Bernstein for respondent.

Concur: LEWIS, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE and FROESSEL, JJ. Dissent: CONWAY, FULD and VAN VOORHIS, JJ.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

CONWAY, FULD and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum:

While we, of course, agree that "the Supreme Court has power, in its sound discretion, upon good cause shown", to direct an inspection of corporate books (Matter of Steinway, 159 N.Y. 250, 265; see, also, Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp., 270 N.Y. 464), we do not believe that such cause was shown to exist in this case to justify...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases