HAROCO CO., INC. v. NAT'L SUR. CORP.


283 A.D. 921 (1954)

Haroco Company, Inc., Respondent, v. National Surety Corporation, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 11, 1954.


Per Curiam.

In the absence of a showing of fraud or collusion the compensated surety is liable for the judgment recovered in the action in accordance with the terms of its bond. However, the judgment is "only prima facie evidence against the surety" (Brescia Constr. Co. v. Walart Constr. Co., 245 App. Div. 105, 108). It appears from the record that $500 of the amount of the judgment recovered does not stem from a liability owed by the principal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases