MAPLES v. HORTON

No. 599.

80 S.E.2d 38 (1954)

239 N.C. 394

MAPLES v. HORTON et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 29, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McKeithen & McConnell, Pinehurst, for appellant.

Rowe & Rowe, Southern Pines, for appellees.


DENNY, Justice.

This appeal requires the determination of two questions: (1) Do the covenants and restrictions in the deeds for lots sold by the developer, Frank Maples, negative a general plan or scheme for the development of the area of land in question for residential purposes? (2) If so, may the plaintiff enforce such restrictions as personal covenants? In our opinion the answer to the first question must be in the affirmative, and to the second question, in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases