COOPER v. KENSIL


31 N.J. Super. 87 (1954)

106 A.2d 27

ARTHUR M. COOPER, STANLEY FRANKEL AND MAPLE SHADE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFFS, v. THEODORE J. KENSIL, CORONET CONSTRUCTION CO., BERLIN GARDENS, INC., BROKERS MORTGAGE SERVICE AND D.V.M. INVESTMENT COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided June 2, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Louis B. LeDuc, attorney for plaintiffs.

Mr. George D. Rothermel and Mr. Samuel Kalikman, attorneys for defendants.


HANEMAN, J.S.C.

Plaintiffs herein seek the specific performance of an agreement, under the terms of which they were allegedly afforded an option by the defendant Kensil to participate in future projects for the construction and sale of dwellings. The facts in connection herewith are as follows:

Under date of April 1, 1952 the plaintiffs and the defendant Kensil entered into an agreement which contemplated a housing development by a corporation organized by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases