BRADICK v. DEETJEN


307 N.Y. 863 (1954)

Albert Bradick, Respondent, v. Rudolph H. Deetjen et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 22, 1954


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wm. Francis Corson, Daniel F. Cohalan and George F. Roberts for appellants.

William J. Cogan and Simon Klein for respondent.

LEWIS, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The Justice at Special Term ruled, in the exercise of discretion (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 102), that decision on the merits of the question raised by defendants' motion should be deferred until the trial. The Appellate Division, in affirming the order of Special Term and in granting leave to appeal to this court, failed to state that its decision was based solely on questions of law and was not in the exercise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases