1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 99 Ohio
  5. 99 Ohio App. 17 (1954)
 

HOTZE, KUNTZLER & CO. v. ERSKINE

No. 7765.

99 Ohio App. 17 (1954)

HOTZE, KUNTZLER & CO., APPELLANT, v. ERSKINE ET AL., APPELLEES.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County.

Decided February 8, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John R. Gehrig and Mr. R. Edward Tepe, for appellant.

Messrs. Kunkel & Kunkel and Mr. John H. Heilker, for appellees George J. Hare and Raymond F. Hare.

Mr. E. R. Heisel and Mr. Chauncey Pichel, for appellee James Erskine.

ROSS, J.

After the plaintiff, appellant herein, had effected an appeal on questions of law and fact, he filed an amended petition in this court, to which the defendants filed demurrers on the ground that such amended petition did not contain facts constituting a cause of action.

The causes of action sought to be stated in such amended petition were for specific performance of a verbal contract to sell real estate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases