1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 209 F.2d
  5. 209 F.2d 957 (1954)
 

BICKART v. UNION BARGE LINE CORPORATION

No. 11164.

209 F.2d 957 (1954)

Arthur BICKART, Appellant, v. UNION BARGE LINE CORPORATION, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided February 1, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hymen Schlesinger, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

John R. Bredin; Dalzell, Pringle, Bredin & Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The district judge found that the date of appellant's maximum recovery from the injury involved was September 8, 1946; that the amount due him in this action for maintenance and cure was $575, and that there was no proof that the massage and heat applications, self administered, under which further maintenance is claimed were curative treatments. There is substantial evidence to justify those findings.

The judgment of the district court,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases