HONEYCUTT v. NABORS


271 S.W.2d 859 (1954)

Hayden HONEYCUTT, Plaintiff in Error, v. M.H. NABORS, Trena Nabors, b/n/f M.H. Nabors, Deana Nabors.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

October 8, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Brinkley, Gallatin, for plaintiff in error.

J.L. Lackey, W. C. Davidson, and R. H. Polk, Nashville, for defendants.


SWEPSTON, Justice.

The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss this writ of error, or in the alternative to strike it on two grounds: First, that there is no motion for a new trial of record in the cause, and second, that there is no prayer for an appeal, nor is there an order granting an appeal on file in the record in this cause.

This motion must be overruled for the reason first, that the alleged error is asserted to be apparent on the face of the technical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases