1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 283 A.D.
  5. 283 A.D. 836 (1954)
 

REDDEN v. SCHMIDT

283 A.D. 836 (1954)

William Redden et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Henry E. Schmidt, Respondent, and Walter J. Saltis, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Theron Redden et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Henry E. Schmidt, Respondent, and Walter J. Saltis, Appellant. (Action No. 2.) John Redden et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Henry E. Schmidt, Respondent, and Walter J. Saltis, Appellant. (Action No. 3.) Dorothy Saltis, Plaintiff, v. Henry E. Schmidt, Defendant. (Action No. 4.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

March 24, 1954.

In the first three actions the two defendants are alleged to be joint tort-feasors. It would seem that all of the issues should be determined before any judgments are enforced. The jury deliberated for many hours, returned to court to have testimony read and for further instructions, indicating some confusion. Upon the argument of this appeal both counsel for the plaintiffs and counsel for defendant Saltis asked for a new trial of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases