PAIGE v. IUS

Nos. 32559, 32558.

45 Wn.2d 65 (1954)

273 P.2d 492

FRED D. PAIGE, as Administrator, Appellant, v. DENO A. IUS et al., Respondents. KATHRYN A. PAIGE, Appellant, v. DENO A. IUS et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 23, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Everal Carson, for appellants.

Virgil Scheiber, for respondents.


PER CURIAM:

In these two actions, which were consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal, judgments were entered for plaintiffs. They appeal, and assign as the only error the denial of their motions for a new trial. It is their contention that the damages awarded were so inadequate as unmistakably to indicate that the verdicts must have been the result of passion or prejudice.

In each case, an order denying the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases