MATTER OF SHORR v. U-WANNA-WASH FROCKS


284 A.D. 778 (1954)

In the Matter of the Claim of Benjamin Shorr, Now Deceased, by Lena Shorr, His Widow, Respondent, v. U-Wanna-Wash Frocks, Inc., et al., Appellants Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

November 18, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dunton F. Tynan and Joseph Boochever for appellants.

Martin B. Nadle for claimant-respondent.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Harry Pastor and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

FOSTER, P. J., BERGAN, COON, HALPERN and IMRIE, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The question in this case is whether the claimant's employment was a New York employment subject to the New York Workmen's Compensation Law.

The claimant was employed by the appellant employer, a dress manufacturer, as a designer, pattern-maker and copyist. During the first three years of his employment, the claimant worked in New York City at the employer's place of business. During this period...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases