1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 213 F.2d
  5. 213 F.2d 814 (1954)
 

CONSOLIDATED FLOWER SHIPMENTS v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BD.

No. 13727.

213 F.2d 814 (1954)

CONSOLIDATED FLOWER SHIPMENTS, Inc.—BAY AREA v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD et al.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied August 3, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Antonio J. Gaudio, South San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Stanley N. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ralph S. Spritzer, Special Asst. to Atty. Gen., John H. Wanner, Associate General Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, Emory T. Nunneley, Jr., General Counsel, James L. Highsaw, Jr., Chief, Litigation & Research Division, O. D. Ozment, Henry M. Switkay, Attys., Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington, D. C., for respondent, Civil Aeronautics Board.

Paul T. Wolf, San Francisco, Cal., for Airborne Flower and Freight Traffic, Inc., respondent.

Before HEALY, ORR and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges.

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

In the San Francisco Bay area the growing and marketing of flowers is a substantial business. Air freight transportation has enabled the growers in recent years to sell their flowers in markets formerly denied them.

This case is concerned with some of the aspects of the interstate shipment by air of flowers.1 The grower, of course, could do business directly with an air carrier without using an air freight...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases