1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 32 N.J.
  5. 32 N.J. Super. 70 (1954)
 

ORROK v. PARMIGIANI

32 N.J. Super. 70 (1954)

107 A.2d 815

DAVID P. ORROK AND ETHEL ORROK, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JOHN PARMIGIANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS PARMIE'S AGENCY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 16, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Paul Lustbader argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Robert M. Kronman argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the County Court, entered on defendant's motion, dismissing their complaint and amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. R.R. 4:12-2(e). The basis of the court's action was that the oral agreement on which plaintiffs' suit was based was within the statute of frauds. R...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases