1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 103 A.2d
  5. 103 A.2d 918 (1954)
 

LEE BUILDERS v. WELLS

Civ. A. No. 200.

103 A.2d 918 (1954)

LEE BUILDERS, Inc. v. WELLS et al.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

March 17, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert W. James and H. James Conaway, Jr. (of Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams), Wilmington, for plaintiff.

Daniel O. Hastings and Clarence W. Taylor (of Hastings, Stockly & Walz), Wilmington, for defendants.

BRAMHALL, Vice Chancellor.

This suit has been remanded to this court by the supreme court for the purpose of determining defendants' counterclaim for damages. More complete statements of the essential facts will be found in the opinion of the supreme court, Wells v. Lee Builders, Inc., Del.Ch., 99 A.2d 620, and the former opinion of this court, Lee Builders, Inc. v. Wells, Del.Ch., 92 A.2d 710.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases