1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 73 S.E.2d
  5. 73 S.E.2d 922 (1953)
 

CROUSE v. CROUSE

No. 747.

73 S.E.2d 922 (1953)

236 N.C. 763

CROUSE v. CROUSE.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 6, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Clay Hemric, Burlington, for the plaintiff, appellant.

J. Elmer Long and Clarence Ross, Graham, for the defendant, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff's counsel propounded this question to her on her re-direct examination: "Will you tell the jury about that?" The court sustained the defendant's objection to the question, and the plaintiff noted an exception to this ruling. This exception presents nothing for review because the case on appeal does not show what testimony the plaintiff would have given had she been permitted to answer the question. Lipe v. Guilford Nat. Bank,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases