1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 62 So.2d
  5. 62 So.2d 903 (1953)
 

HENSARLING v. CURTIS CANDY CO.

62 So.2d 903 (1953)

HENSARLING v. CURTIS CANDY CO.

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.

January 30, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Coe & Coe, Pensacola, for appellant.

Holsberry, Holsberry & Emmanuel, Pensacola, for appellee.

MATHEWS, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment non obstante veredicto.

After all of the testimony had been adduced, the appellee moved for directed verdict which was denied, but thereafter the Court stated:

"I want to reserve my ruling for a directed verdict."

This entire controversy revolves around three checks given by the appellant to the appellee which had been returned to the appellee by the bank, upon which they were drawn, because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases