ROHM & HAAS CO. v. PERMUTIT CO.

Civ. 1525.

114 F.Supp. 846 (1953)

ROHM & HAAS CO. v. PERMUTIT CO.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

July 16, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur G. Connolly and Thomas Cooch (of Connolly, Cooch & Bove), Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Caleb S. Layton and Henry M. Canby (of Richards, Layton & Finger), Wilmington, Del., Clarence D. Kerr and W. P. Churchill (of Fish, Richardson & Neave), New York City, for defendant.


RODNEY, District Judge.

This is an infringement suit and the questions arise from a motion to dismiss the complaint. Affidavits having been filed and not excluded, the questions are considered as on a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, 28 U.S.C.

The complaint alleges the issuance of a patent to the plaintiff on February 24, 1953, covering, generally, matters relating to insoluble resins used in the treatment of water, and a notice of infringement is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases