1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 114 F.Supp.
  5. 114 F.Supp. 834 (1953)
 

SANDSBERRY v. GULF, C. & S. F. RY. CO.

Civ. A. No. 1611.

114 F.Supp. 834 (1953)

SANDSBERRY et al. v. GULF, C. & S. F. RY. CO. et al.

United States District Court N. D. Texas, Amarillo Division.

July 31, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Simpson, Clayton & Fullingim, Amarillo, Tex., for plaintiffs.

J. C. Gibson, R. S. Outlaw, and William J. Milroy, Chicago, Ill., Adkins, Folley, Adkins, McConnell & Hankins, Amarillo, Tex., Wigley, McLeod, Mills & Shirley, Galveston, Tex., Lewis Jeffrey, Amarillo, Tex., for defendant railroads.

Mullinax & Wells, Dallas, Tex., Schoene & Kramer, and Mulholland, Robie & Hickey, Washington, D. C., for union defendants.

DOOLEY, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, natural persons of Texas, being three employees of Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and eleven employees of the Panhandle and Santa Fe Railway Company, all save one nonunion employees, brought this suit in a district court of Texas against the said two companies and Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway Company, as well as sixteen labor unions or associations and numerous...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases