1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 204 F.2d
  5. 204 F.2d 737 (1953)
 

U. S. PRINTING & NOVELTY CO. v. FEDERAL TRADE COM'N

No. 11602.

204 F.2d 737 (1953)

U. S. PRINTING & NOVELTY CO., Inc. et al. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 4, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Horace J. Donnelly, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Arthur V. Sullivan, Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioners.

Mr. Alan B. Hobbes, Special Attorney, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Robert B. Dawkins, Assistant General Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for respondent.

Before PROCTOR, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Federal Trade Commission.1 The facts are essentially similar to those in Hamilton Manufacturing Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 1952, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 169, 194 F.2d 346, 348. The order of the Commission forbids petitioner, a manufacturing printer, to sell in interstate commerce "push cards, punchboards, or other lottery devices which are to be used...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases