1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 73 S.E.2d
  5. 73 S.E.2d 865 (1953)
 

FELDMAN v. FELDMAN

No. 674.

73 S.E.2d 865 (1953)

236 N.C. 731

FELDMAN v. FELDMAN

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 6, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hayes, Hatfield & McClain, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellee.

Jordan & Wright and Perry C. Henson, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant.

BARNHILL, Justice.

Allowance of alimony payable after a decree of divorce a vinculo was unknown to the common law. Duffy v. Duffy, 120 N.C. 346, 27 S.E. 28; Lockman v. Lockman, 220 N.C. 95, 16 S.E.2d 670; Gavit Black Com., pp. 188, 189.

"At common law, where a divorce a vinculo matrimonii was granted, no allowance for the future support of the wife was given, and we have no statute in this state allowing it." Duffy v. Duffy, supra; Crews v....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases