1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 112 F.Supp.
  5. 112 F.Supp. 825 (1953)
 

KOWALEWSKI v. CITY OF HASTINGS

Civ. Nos. 2243-2245.

112 F.Supp. 825 (1953)

KOWALEWSKI v. CITY OF HASTINGS et al. (three cases).

United States District Court D. Minnesota, Third Division.

June 1, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amherst Tautges and James B. Lund, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiffs.

Roy W. Ganfield, of Ganfield & O'Connell, Hastings, Minn., and John A. McEachron, Jr., Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant City of Hastings.

John J. Sexton, St. Paul, Minn., for defendants Okes, Palda and Okes Const. Co.

DONOVAN, District Judge.

Defendant City of Hastings has filed a motion in each of these three cases for summary judgment in its favor, in accordance with Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Subsequently plaintiffs were allowed to amend their complaints.1 Defendant City now renews its motion claiming that the amendments are sham and frivolous and present no genuine issue of fact. The motion is based on the pleadings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases