1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 116 F.Supp.
  5. 116 F.Supp. 800 (1953)
 

RICHMAN BROTHERS COMPANY v. AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA

Civ. A. No. 29671.

116 F.Supp. 800 (1953)

RICHMAN BROTHERS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA et al., Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

January 21, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jones, Day, Cockley & Reavis, Cleveland, Ohio (Luther Day, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Corrigan, MacMahon & Corrigan, Cleveland, Ohio (William J. Corrigan and Moses Krislov, Cleveland, Ohio, and William J. Isaacson, New York City), for defendants.

McNAMEE, District Judge.

The arguments submitted in defendants' brief in support of their motion for a reconsideration are but restatements of arguments previously submitted. In their reargument defendants imply that the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Direct Transit Lines v. Local Union No. 406, 199 F.2d 89, approved the proposition that a District Court may remove a case even though it is without jurisdiction to hear and determine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases