1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 96 A.2d
  5. 96 A.2d 815 (1953)
 

STATE v. CALKINS

No. 1038.

96 A.2d 815 (1953)

STATE v. CALKINS.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

May 5, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James T. Haugh, Rutland, for plaintiff.

Philip M. M. Phelps, Fair Haven, for defendant.

Before SHERBURNE, C. J., and JEFFORDS, CLEARY, ADAMS and CUSHING, JJ.

SHERBURNE, Chief Justice.

The respondent has been found guilty of a violation of an ordinance of the city of Rutland. He has attempted to brief two questions. Since his brief on these questions is very short we quote it in full:

"Point One. "Was there error in excluding evidence as to the unreasonableness of the ordinance? "Ordinarily the unreasonableness of an ordinance is a question of law, but it may become a question of fact, or a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases