1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 204 F.2d
  5. 204 F.2d 684 (1953)
 

ARBOLINO v. SHAUGHNESSY

204 F.2d 684 (1953)

ARBOLINO v. SHAUGHNESSY, District Director et al. SESSA v. SHAUGHNESSY, District Director et al.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 13, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Resnicoff, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Myles J. Lane, U. S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, New York City (Nathan Skolnik, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

Before L. HAND and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Since the defendants have no duty but to direct the plaintiff to report in Texas, and that is merely a transmission of the order of the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization in Washington, the action is within the decisions of the Supreme Court in Blackmar v. Guerre, 342 U.S. 512 [72 S.Ct. 410, 96 L.Ed. 534] and of this court in Reeber v. Rossel, 2 Cir., 200 F.2d 334. In Williams...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases