1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 115 Cal.App.2d
  5. 115 Cal.App.2d 769 (1953)
 

HOWARTH v. HOWARTH

Docket No. 19122.

115 Cal.App.2d 769 (1953)

252 P.2d 743

MAE K. HOWARTH, Respondent, v. FRED J. HOWARTH, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

February 4, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L.M. Cahill for Appellant.

William J. Donahue and Riccardi & Webster for Respondent.

PATROSSO, J. pro tem.

This action was instituted by plaintiff to recover subsequently accrued installments under the same property settlement agreement executed between herself and her former husband, the defendant herein, which was the subject of a previous action between the same parties. The judgment rendered therein, in favor of plaintiff, was affirmed upon appeal by this court. (Howarth v. Howarth, 81 Cal.App.2d 266 [183 P.2d 670].) The opinion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases