1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 99 A.2d
  5. 99 A.2d 776 (1953)
 

EMERSON v. EMERSON

99 A.2d 776 (1953)

EMERSON et al. v. EMERSON et al.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

August 4, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen E. Hamilton, Jr., of Wilmington, for Alice P. Brown.

Edward W. Cooch, Jr., receiver, of Wilmington, for himself.

Clement C. Wood, of Young & Wood, and Oliver V. Suddard, of Wise & Suddard, of Wilmington, for objectors.

SEITZ, Chancellor.

This is the decision on the objection of the receiver and certain other interested parties to the claim of Alice P. Brown on a demand promissory note in so far as she seeks interest thereon.

Alice P. Brown claims that the note provides on its face for interest. The objecting parties claim that it does not.

The demand promissory note, dated April 12, 1947, was signed by the then partners, William O. Emerson and Frank B. Emerson. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases