MUELLER v. POWELL

No. 432.

115 F.Supp. 744 (1953)

MUELLER v. POWELL et al.

United States District Court W. D. Missouri, Central Division.

October 15, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Harris & Hanke, by V. B. Harris, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Dan C. Carter, Sturgeon, Mo., R. E. Ausmus, Warren D. Welliver, Columbia, Mo., for defendant.


REEVES, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff's motion to retax costs was heretofore sustained upon the theory that no opposition was offered to said motion. It appeared later that counsel for the defendants was unaware of the pendency of said motion and it was for that reason it was not resisted. It is fundamental that where a motion for the retaxing of costs is filed it is the duty of the party filing the motion to give his adversary notice thereof. 20 C.J.S., Costs, §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases