1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 264 Wis.
  5. 264 Wis. 589 (1953)
 

LASKER v. PATROVSKY

264 Wis. 589 (1953)

LASKER and others, Appellants, vs. PATROVSKY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 6, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Dougherty, Arnold & Waters of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Suel O. Arnold.

For the respondent there was a brief by Thompson, Gruenewald & McCarthy of Oshkosh, and oral argument by Marvin L. McCarthy and Robert R. Thompson.

GEHL, J.

Plaintiffs contend that defendant was bound by the auctioneer's oral announcement at the sale that the premises could be used only for residence purposes, and that the representations made in the advertisement of sale fall out of the case. They are right, and unless the execution of the first memorandum made after the premises were knocked down requires the application of rules defeating them, they should prevail. In Keske v. Boeder, 168 Wis. 369,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases