MUTH v. W.P. LAHEY'S, INC.

Docket Nos. 38, 39. Calendar Nos. 45,925, 45,926.

338 Mich. 513 (1953)

61 N.W.2d 619

MUTH v. W.P. LAHEY'S INC.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided December 29, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marcus, Kelman, Loria, McCroskey & Finucan (Thomas W. Finucan, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Mitts, Smith & Haughey, for defendant W.P. Lahey's, Inc.

Sessions & Barlow, for defendant Brummel Shoes, Inc.


CARR, J.

On the 7th of November, 1950, plaintiff Mina Muth entered the store of W.P. Lahey's, Inc., in the city of Muskegon. After paying a bill she proceeded to the shoe department, which was at the time operated by the other defendant, Brummel Shoes, Inc., pursuant to the provisions of a lease between defendants that set forth at some length their respective contractual rights and obligations. It was Mrs. Muth's intention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases