MATTER OF HEYMAN v. McGOLDRICK


281 A.D. 558 (1953)

In the Matter of Henry K. Heyman, Respondent, v. Joseph D. McGoldrick, as State Rent Administrator, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 21, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beatrice Shainswit of counsel (Robert H. Schaffer, attorney), for appellant.

Henry K. Heyman, respondent in person.

DORE, VAN VOORHIS and BREITEL, JJ., concur.


PECK, P. J.

The State Rent Commission found that the landlord in this proceeding was entitled to a rent increase in order to attain the net annual return allowed by law (State Residential Rent Law, § 4, subd. 4; L. 1946, ch. 274, as amd.). The problem presented is one of apportionment of the required increase between tenants who have previously given a 15% voluntary increase and those who have not. The commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases