1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 265 Wis.
  5. 265 Wis. 555 (1953)
 

DOLEYS v. ARNDT

265 Wis. 555 (1953)

DOLEYS and another, Respondents, vs. ARNDT and another, Appellants. SITAVSKI, Respondent, vs. SAME, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 30, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by D. J. Regan of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by A. R. Becker, attorney, and Eisenberg, Kletzke, Ratzel, Dern & Yockey of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Sydney M. Eisenberg and Mr. Becker.

BROWN, J.

The appellants charge that in the Elizabeth Doleys action the damages are excessive, not supported by the evidence, and are the result of passion and prejudice on the part of the jury. The error complained of is the trial court's refusal to grant a new trial. In the Sitavski action the error alleged by appellants is the trial court's refusal to vacate the judgment on the ground that the evidence does not support the award of damages.

Appellants'...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases