WISCONSIN AXLE DIVISION v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.


263 Wis. 529 (1953)

WISCONSIN AXLE DIVISION (Timken-Detroit Axle Company), Appellant, vs. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 31, 1953.

September 11, 1953.

October 6, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the briefs of Otjen & Otjen of Milwaukee, and for the respondent Industrial Commission on the brief of the Attorney General and Mortimer Levitan, assistant attorney general.


FRITZ, C. J.

The brief of the attorney general in behalf of the commission contends that the original stipulation was based on a "stipulation of settlement" and inasmuch as the word "compromise" did not appear therein, therefore, under the provisions of sec. 102.16 (1), Stats., the six-year limitation in sec. 102.17 (4) applies; and that the so-called "additional" order of January 5, 1945, had the effect of starting a new six-year period of limitation in operation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases