1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 264 Wis.
  5. 264 Wis. 522 (1953)
 

WALTER v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

264 Wis. 522 (1953)

WALTER, Appellant, vs. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

July 3, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by H. William Ihrig of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the Attorney General and Mortimer Levitan, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Levitan.

For the respondent International Harvester Company there was a brief by Otjen & Otjen of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Carl Neprud Otjen.

BROADFOOT, J.

The primary contention of the plaintiff is that there is no credible evidence to support the finding of the Industrial Commission that applicant's complaint and disability were due to causes wholly unrelated to his alleged injuries of 1936 or his employment with the International Harvester Company.

There is no doubt that the plaintiff's spinal column is rigid due to a form of arthritis. This affected his spine, his hips, and to some extent, his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases