PER CURIAM.
This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel:
And it appearing that it was a question of fact whether appellant was negligent in grounding its semaphore tower so that in the event of lightning striking the tower a side flash passing into the telegraph shanty was probable and foreseeable, and whether defects existed in the equipment maintained by appellant in appellee's telegraph shanty, and whether such...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
