UNITED STATES v. MARIENFELD

No. 27064.

116 F.Supp. 634 (1953)

UNITED STATES v. MARIENFELD.

United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.

November 23, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. H. Goldschein, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., W. Francis Murrell, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Finch & Finch, James A. Finch, Jr., Cape Girardeau, Mo., Harry C. Blanton, Sikeston, Mo., James A. Cochrane, Jr., Cape Girardeau, Mo., for defendant.


HULEN, District Judge.

In presenting motion for new trial defendant complained of: (1) failure to sustain motion to dismiss on defendant's embezzlement theory; (2) failure to admit his Exhibit 72; (3) the giving to the jury, to have with them when considering their verdict, the three papers marked Exhibits A, B and C, prepared by the Court; (4) refusal to admit testimony as to defendant's attempt, after he was indicted, to have Stokely-Van Camp recognize he owed them...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases