A reversal would be justified in this case only if the court were to ignore the plain command of the applicable statutes that the essential notice of claim must be served upon a "member of the board of education, * * * [a] trustee, or the clerk thereof" (Civ. Prac. Act, § 228, subd. 6; General Municipal Law, § 50-e). Concededly, there was a complete failure to obey or comply with that mandate...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
