IN RE RICE

No. 33400.

60 N.W.2d 668 (1953)

157 Neb. 579

In re RICE. RICE v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

October 30, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred N. Hellner, Omaha, Moran & James, Nebraska City, for plaintiff in error.

Pilcher & Haney, Omaha, for defendant in error.

Heard before SIMMONS, C. J., and MESSMORE, YEAGER, CHAPPELL, WENKE, and BOSLAUGH, JJ.


SIMMONS, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff in error Roy Rice, a witness, was found guilty of contempt of court for refusal to answer certain questions and refusal to produce documents in response to a subpoena duces tecum in a proceeding whereby his deposition was being taken. He was fined $1 and costs. His application to set aside the judgment and quash the proceeding being overruled, he brings the matter here by petition in error.

It is patent that the parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases