BRINKLEY v. ADMINISTRATOR


139 Conn. 588 (1953)

MARY BRINKLEY v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 24, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Rosen, on the brief for the appellant (plaintiff).

George C. Conway, attorney general, and Harry Silverstone, assistant attorney general, on the brief for the appellee (defendant).

BROWN, C. J., JENNINGS, BALDWIN, INGLIS and O'SULLIVAN, JS.


JENNINGS, J.

The question to be decided is whether the plaintiff was available for work so as to be entitled to benefits under General Statutes, § 7507. The finding as corrected by the commissioner may be summarized as follows: The plaintiff is thirty-two-years old and single. She is a hard worker and is more interested in finding employment than in collecting unemployment compensation. She had been working at the Woodbridge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases