LABOR BOARD v. DANT

No. 97.

344 U.S. 375 (1953)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. DANT ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS DANT & RUSSELL, LTD.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 2, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David P. Findling argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, George J. Bott and Mozart G. Ratner.

John T. Casey argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were R. S. Smethurst and R. S. Haslam.

Arthur J. Goldberg and Thomas E. Harris filed a brief for the Congress of Industrial Organizations, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.

An amici curiae brief urging affirmance was filed by Rufus G. Poole for the Shell Chemical Corporation, Frank A. Constangy for the American Thread Company, J. Adrian Rosenburg for Jack Smith Beverages, Inc., Edward F. Conlin for Edwards Brothers, Inc., and Alexander E. Wilson, Jr. and G. Maynard Smith for the I. B. S. Manufacturing Company.


MR. JUSTICE REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

The National Labor Relations Board issued a complaint on March 27, 1950, following a charge filed August 3, 1949, by the International Woodworkers of America, Local 6-7, against respondent, Dant & Russell, Ltd. The charge was filed in accordance with the procedure of the Act, § 10 (b), and was based on violations of § 8 (a) (1) and (3).1 After the usual proceedings, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases