PETERS v. HALL


263 Wis. 450 (1953)

PETERS, Appellant, vs. HALL, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 31, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Fisher & Fisher of Janesville, and oral argument by Cleland P. Fisher.

For the respondent there was a brief by Thronson, Roethe & Agnew of Janesville, and oral argument by John Roethe and Ernest P. Agnew.


BROADFOOT, J.

Plaintiff contends that the jury's answers to questions 1 and 2 in the special verdict are contrary to all of the evidence; that the award of damages is so inadequate as to show perversity and prejudice on the part of the jury; and that a new trial should be awarded in the interests of justice because of erroneous instructions by the court.

It is apparent from the record that the case was not properly submitted to the jury. It is clear from the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases