1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 208 F.2d
  5. 208 F.2d 500 (1953)
 

SPRINGS COTTON MILLS v. HALL LABORATORIES

No. 6641.

208 F.2d 500 (1953)

SPRINGS COTTON MILLS, Inc. v. HALL LABORATORIES, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Decided December 17, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Hoxie, New York City (D. Reece Williams, Lancaster, S. C., Davis, Hoxie & Faithfull, New York City, George W. Price, Swampscott, Mass., and A. Z. F. Wood, Lancaster, S. C., on brief), for appellant.

Walter J. Blenko, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Eugene F. Buell, James K. Everhart, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., John T. Roddey, Rock Hill, S. C., Blenko, Hoopes, Leonard & Buell, Pittsburgh, Pa., and Roddey & Ward, Rock Hill, S. C., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges, and WILKIN, District Judge.

SOPER, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit for infringement of United States patent No. 2,337,856 which was granted to Owen Rice and George B. Hatch on December 28, 1943 upon an application filed October 27, 1942. The plaintiff is Hall Laboratories, Inc., of Pennsylvania, assignee of the patent, and the defendant is The Springs Cotton Mills, Inc., of South Carolina for which Rumford Chemical Works of Rhode Island, supplier of the chemical used in infringement of the patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases