THE MATUSOW MFG. CO. v. WEINRAUB ET AL.


86 Pa. D. & C. 557 (1953)

The Matusow Manufacturing Company v. Weinraub et al.

Common Pleas Court of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania.

January 21, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis Lipschitz and Wm. J. Woolston, for plaintiff.

Joseph H. Resnick, for defendants.

Jay D. Barsky, for Emanuel Steinberg.


ALESSANDRONI, J., January 21, 1953.

Plaintiff instituted its action in equity by summons. Thereafter a petition was filed praying for a rule on defendants to show cause why plaintiff should not have discovery under the then Equity Rule 35, now Pa. R.C.P. 4001 et seq. The petition averred that plaintiff employed one Emanuel Steinberg as a salesman; that Steinberg sold merchandise to defendants outside the normal channels of business, that defendants purchased the merchandise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases