ROSE v. CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE


19 Misc.2d 599 (1953)

Nicholas Rose, Plaintiff, v. City of New Rochelle, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Westchester County.

January 21, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rubin & Rubin (Irving A. Rubin of counsel), for plaintiff.

Murray C. Fuerst, Corporation Counsel (John A. Bodner of counsel), for defendant.


SAMUEL W. EAGER, J.

This is an action by a property owner against the City of New Rochelle for declaratory judgment determining that a certain amendment to the city Zoning Ordinance is unconstitutional and void. The plaintiff moves under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike out a certain defense in defendant's answer and also moves for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112. Where a motion is made by plaintiff for judgment on the pleadings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases